Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayya Labib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rayya Labib

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Premature for inclusion. Fails WP:BEFORE as there is nothing at Google News or Books. Fails WP:GNG as there is virtually nothing significant written about her. Fails WP:NACTOR as there is no indication of multiple significant roles. There is only one role listed in her article for a film that may or may not have even started principal photography (Lakme (2016 film) is unsourced as of this writing) but even then, there is no "multiple" notable films. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 23:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not notable and unacceptable article borderline with A7 and G11. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 15:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is recommended to DELETE this article as soon as possible. There is no evidence to demonstrate the notability of the topic. - 11sw4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11sw4 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.